| 03-25-2004, 01:11 PM | #1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,381
|
I know there are other factors that weigh in but what constitutes better emissions lean or rich?
|
|
    
|
| 03-25-2004, 01:39 PM | #2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 664
|
They both pretty much screw up emissions, but I would say rich because running rich you'll have a buildup of depostis in your catalytic converter reducing it's effectiveness, and clog up your 02 sensors (fouling) so they won't read as accurately.
__________________
1996 Civic coupe 2004 Lexus RX330 2007 Corolla S 2006 Ford Crown Vic (guess my job  )Gone: 86' Celica best car ever! 97 Accord 94 BMW convertible 97 BMW convertible 03 Corolla S 07 Scion TC 1994 240sx Convertible |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Emissions Test | Tarheelz_nc04 | Civic | 1 | 11-30-2005 03:50 AM |
| Turbos And Emissions | V-Bizzle | Newbie Tech Questions | 10 | 09-20-2005 09:36 AM |
| Emissions | B18bEK | Forced Induction | 22 | 05-16-2005 08:25 PM |
| Emissions Code | pandora63 | Off-Topic | 0 | 08-28-2004 05:38 AM |
| Failed Emissions | Synergy CiViC | Newbie Tech Questions | 11 | 04-15-2004 05:02 AM |
Linear Mode
